DISCUS-IS Research Blog · Post 3 of 4 · Series: What Students Tell Us
How the structure of collaborative statistics classrooms changes students’ relationship with not knowing
DISCUS-IS Project Team · NSF IUSE #2314358 · Tags: Help-seeking · Equity · Classroom cultureAsking for help is not a neutral act. For many students — particularly those who have internalized narratives about who belongs in quantitative courses — raising a hand in front of a class full of people carries real social risk. You are telling everyone in the room that you don’t understand something. That risk is not evenly distributed.
One of the more striking patterns in the DISCUS-IS data was how consistently students connected the structure of their collaborative statistics classroom to their own willingness to ask questions. Across 36 student interviews and focus groups, help-seeking was a recurring theme — and groupwork, it turned out, changed the calculus.
Avery described something that came up in several students’ accounts: the experience of asking a question “on behalf of the group” rather than as an individual request:
If I had a question, I wasn’t scared to ask because we were doing it as a group, rather than I was doing it by myself… If I have a question, it could be for just me or it could be for other people.
— Avery, student participant
This is a subtle but important shift. A question asked in a small-group context is ambiguous in a way that a hand raised in front of a full class is not: it might be the student’s confusion, or it might be the group’s. That ambiguity reduces the felt exposure of not knowing, and appears to lower the threshold for asking.
Ophelia, who participated in a paired interview with Danielle, described preferring to ask questions in small groups for a related reason: “I feel like asking questions in a smaller group is better than asking questions in front of our entire class.” Her instructor seemed to understand this intuitively. Selena noted: “She understood that a lot of people probably weren’t comfortable asking questions out loud in front of the whole class, so she would come over to us like individually and to our groups.”
In the classrooms students described, asking questions was not framed as a sign of inadequacy. It was framed as a form of participation — something that helped the whole group, not just the individual. Blake put it explicitly:
Be the first one to ask a question in the class because if other students see you asking a question, they’re more likely to also ask a question.
— Blake, student participant
This is classroom culture, not just individual disposition. When instructors design classrooms in which questioning is modeled, expected, and rewarded — when they circulate and invite groups to surface their confusions, when they build whole-class discussion on questions that arose in small groups — they change what asking feels like for students.
Heidi urged future statistics students: “If you have any questions, ask the questions. Because especially the people that I’ve seen in class ask clarifying stuff, it really helps them and they get the hang of it.” Brianna simply observed: “We’ve asked questions about it during class. We ask a lot of clarifying questions honestly.” The matter-of-factness of that statement is itself meaningful.
The help-seeking literature in mathematics education is consistent: students who believe they can ask for help when they need it learn more, persist longer, and develop more accurate models of their own understanding. The challenge is that many students — particularly those who have encountered messages that quantitative courses are “not for them” — have learned not to ask.
The structure of collaborative instruction in SBI classrooms appears to interrupt that pattern. It doesn’t do it by telling students to ask more questions. It does it by changing the social architecture of the classroom so that asking becomes easier, more natural, and less individually exposing.
For instructors thinking about inclusive design: this suggests that the question is not only “how do I make myself approachable?” but “how do I design the classroom so that not-knowing is a shared, normal, and productive state?” Groupwork, done well, is one answer.
The full DISCUS-IS resource library is available to credentialed educators and researchers.
Video artifacts from real classrooms, interview transcripts, instructor protocols, and student concept inventories — all housed in our protected SharePoint site to honor participant rights. Credentials are granted on a rolling basis to educators and researchers working in postsecondary mathematics and statistics.
← Post 2: Talking it out Next: Honoring the friction →
Part of the “What Students Tell Us” series · DISCUS-IS Project · NSF IUSE #2314358